Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics of the included studies

From: Efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin icodec compared to once-daily insulin g U-100 in patients with type II diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

First author and study year

Study location

Study design

Groups

No. of participants (n)

Sex

Age (Years)

BMI (kg/m2)

Diabetes duration, years

HbA1c %, %

Mathieu, C. et al. [20]

Multicenter

Phase 3a, randomized open-label, multicenter

Icodec

291

M = 154 (53%)

59·7 (10·1)

30·5 (5·0)

18·0 (9·1)

8·29 (0·86)

   

Glargine U-100

291

M = 150 (52%)

59·9 (9·9)

30·0 (5·0)

16·3 (7·7)

8·31 (0·90)

Lingvay, I et al. [18]

Multicenter

Randomized active-controlled parallel-group multicenter, multi-national open-label, phase 2, treat-to-target trial

Icodec

      
   

Tit A

51

M = 52.9

59.8 (9.1)

32.3 (4.8)

9.8 (7.2)

8.0 (0.7)

   

Tit B

51

M = 54.9

61.2 (8.0)

31.4 (4.7)

9.6 (4.9)

8.1 (0.8)

   

Tit C

52

M = 53.8

61.4 (8.0)

30.8 (3.8)

9.2 (4.4)

8.2 (0.9)

   

Glargine U-100

51

M = 52.9

60.2 (8.1)

30.6 (4.7)

11.8 (6.8)

8.2 (0.8)

Bajaj, H. S. et al. [19]

Multicenter

Multicenter, open-label, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, treat-to-target phase 2 trial

Icodec

      
   

LD (loading dose)

54

M = 39 (72.2)

62.4 ± 7.2

30.2 ± 4.3

13.8 ± 7.7

7.8 (0.7)

   

Glargine U-100

50

M = 33 (66.0)

60.5 ± 7.9

30.3 ± 5.0

14.8 ± 8.1

7.9 (0.7)

Rosenstock, J et al. [17]

Multicenter

Randomized, double-blind double-dummy, phase 2 trial

Icodec

125

M = 70 (56%)

59.7 ± 8.2

31.1 ± 4.9

10.5 ± 8.4

8.09 ± 0.70

   

Glargine U-100

122

M = 69 (56.6%)

59.4 ± 9.5

31.4 ± 4.4

8.8 ± 6.1

7.96 ± 0.65